Roundoff News

GROUP TASKS EKITI COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ON TRANSPARENCY, INCLUSIVENESS

…demands full autonomy for LG across Nigeria

Social Development Integrated Centre – Social Action has called on council leadership in Ekiti State to operate a transparent and inclusive system as required by the law.

To this end, the group tasked the Head of Local Government Service Commission to direct all the LGAs to hoist functional websites and create channels of communications, like dedication phone numbers, functional email addresses, sms numbers, what’sapp lines.

The Lead Cluster of the group in Ekiti State, Bukola Adedeji made the call during a press conference held at the Nigeria Union of Journalist (NUJ), Secretariat, Ado Ekiti.

She also advocated the need to direct the departments of research and budget to ensure that NEEDs Assessments of communities are carried out with the full participation of the people while special attention should be given to women and girl’s development and empowerment.

According to her, such development will give people sense of belonging, participation and also enable the councils to meet up with it’s primary responsibilities of impacting on people at the grassroots.

She stressed the need for youths to  be encouraged to learn current skills relevant in today’s world. Micro credits, soft loans and non-interest loans should be made available as this will in small measure increase small holder farmers yield and increase the internally generated revenue of local governments.

The group advocated an amendment of the constitution to create a legislative structure for a truly independent local government system.

According to her, the legislative framework  would make provisions to ensure that the  Local Government Councils have full autonomy, so as to play it’s roles effectively.

Her words: “We strongly believe that a transparent local government system, backed by a well-defined legislative framework to manage its resources subject only to the wishes of the people will deliver the needed development.

“It is when we have an independent local government that the people can confidently engage the council authorities to account for the resources that are elected to manage on behalf of the people.”

Adedeji implored government at all levels, particularly local governments, to diversify and implement income-generating and mobilize policy initiatives for the benefit of Local governments.

“The 774 local governments in Nigeria received a total of 20.3 trillion naira from 2001- 2019 as allocations from the federal government. In spite of these remarkable disbursements, what is left to show for it in terms of development can only be obtained on paper. The communities have continued to endure years of decay in health and educational infrastructural and a decline in the living condition and standards of the people in othe local and suburban areas.

“Several reasons have been adduced for the challenges facing the local government system and its inability to provide effective service delivery to communities. These include poor funding, corruption, paucity of human capital, opaque fiscal systems, poor resource management etc. However, the shortcomings in the constitutional framework that guarantees the autonomy and fiscal independence of the local government in Nigeria and how it affects service delivery have received little attention.

“State governors have annexed the local government authorities and tied them to their apron strings, making them an appendage of the state and subservient to the governors. Even though some of the state governors would claim that they don’t interfere with the day-to-day running of the local council activities but there could never be a truly independent local government without cutting the aprons of the state governments away from it, in other to birth to a third tier of government with complete autonomy.

” This interference is made possible by the state local government joint account which is controlled, expectedly by the state governors. Funds meant for the local government are being held back and administered by the governors and given in piecemeal to the local council authorities.

“The total amount finally handed down is hardly enough to carry out any meaningful project after the payment of salaries of council staff. Funds meant for community development are deducted for various fictitious reasons, the state/local government joint account initiatives, election sponsorship and other deduction not accounted for. Most governors who do this, claim that the local government would mismanage the resources if left to manage them.

Join Roundoff News Telegram Channel, Facebook Page and WhatsApp group for regular updates.